OutSpent
← The Senators

Roll call · S. 3628 · 2010

DISCLOSE Act (unmask dark money)

Would have forced disclosure of dark-money donors. A no vote protected anonymous corporate spending.

What happened

This was a procedural vote. Senators had to reach 60 of 100 to beat a filibuster and let it move forward. Only 57 agreed, 3 short, so it was blocked and went no further.

The tally

57 Yea · 41 Nay · 2 didn't vote. Officially recorded as “Cloture rejected 57-41.”

Did the no-shows matter?

John Ensign (R-NV), Joe Lieberman (I-CT) sat it out. It wouldn't have changed anything. Even if all 2 no-shows had voted Yea, 59 is still short of 60.

Party split

Yea: 56 Democrats, 1 Independent. Nay: 1 Democrat, 40 Republicans.

Crossed party lines

1 Democrat crossed over: Harry Reid (D-NV)

Official Senate roll call ↗

Voted Yea 57

Voted Nay 41

the money's side

Who lobbied this bill

421 organizations reported lobbying on this bill in 2010. Among them, familiar names from the seven worst industries:

Pharma & HealthAHIP
TelecomNCTA

Source: Senate lobbying disclosures (LDA). Filings report spending across many bills at once, so there's no honest per-bill dollar figure. This is who reported working the bill, not how much they spent on it.

A gold dot marks the side that favored concentrated money on this vote. Senators in office today are clickable, so tap any name for their full record. Source: the official Senate roll call, linked above.